Review



green channel imaging  (Sartorius AG)


Bioz Verified Symbol Sartorius AG is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Sartorius AG manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Sartorius AG green channel imaging
    Green Channel Imaging, supplied by Sartorius AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 15587 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/pm42021682-430-4-20?v=Sartorius+AG
    Average 99 stars, based on 15587 article reviews
    green channel imaging - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Sartorius AG green channel imaging
    Green Channel Imaging, supplied by Sartorius AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/pm42021682-430-4-20?v=Sartorius+AG
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    green channel imaging - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Nikon color images and their red, green and blue channels taken by the nikon camera
    Color Images And Their Red, Green And Blue Channels Taken By The Nikon Camera, supplied by Nikon, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/10__1029_slash_2024ja032436-135-12-12?v=Nikon
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    color images and their red, green and blue channels taken by the nikon camera - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PHOTONIS Inc dual multi-channel plate image intensifier cricket hi-qe green
    Dual Multi Channel Plate Image Intensifier Cricket Hi Qe Green, supplied by PHOTONIS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/pmc11299614-26-11-18?v=PHOTONIS+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dual multi-channel plate image intensifier cricket hi-qe green - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments green channel stack images
    Dynamic-sprouting angiogenesis synchronized with MSC migration and adhesion. A Representative 2D fluorescent microscopic <t>images</t> in time series during mono- and co-cultures for 10 days. Monoculture did not show the clear angiogenic sprout, whereas co-culture with MSCs accelerated the formation of mature sprouts. MSCs <t>(green)</t> are encapsulated in the collagen gel toward microvessels (red) and attach to the vessel walls’ surface at an early stage. The elongation of sprouts was promoted after day 4. B Spatial correlation analysis between HUVECs and MSCs. The distribution of HUVECs and MSCs from one co-culture sample is shown as density maps and scatter plots by analyzing the co-culture images shown in ( A ). Pearson’s correlation coefficients, r , were calculated for each day and are shown in the plots. The correlation was constantly high (> 0.7) after day 4. C – E Orientation analysis of MSCs around the microvessels. Scale bars: 100 μm. C Definitions of MSC location and orientation around microvessels to analyze their behavior around microvessels. MSCs beside the vessel walls within a marginal region were considered “neighbor” cells, while MSCs outside of the margin were considered “distant” cells. D Image processing in 2D to quantify the location and orientation of MSCs during co-culture using one sample. After the red <t>channel</t> images were processed, the microvessel’s surface edges were extracted and smoothed (red or thick white lines). After the green channel images were processed, the location and orientation of MSCs were quantified. Please note that the areas in the two pictures are from the same ROI on day 1 and day 10. See “ ” section. Scale bars: 100 μm. E Orientation analysis of “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs by fitting ellipses to the binarized MSC objects. Histograms with thick black lines or filled with green represent “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs, respectively. The numbers in the directional charts represent the number of objects that were detected by the particle analysis. The tilt angles of “neighbor” MSCs were constantly smaller than those of “distant” MSCs through co-culture. Statistical significances between “distant” and “neighbor” MSCs were evaluated using a set of time-lapse images from one HUVEC-CapSC co-culture sample with two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni’s post hoc tests using this fluorescent image set ( n = 1). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01
    Green Channel Stack Images, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/pmc09795717-103-0-7?v=Oxford+Instruments
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    green channel stack images - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher green fluorescence channel floid imaging station
    Dynamic-sprouting angiogenesis synchronized with MSC migration and adhesion. A Representative 2D fluorescent microscopic <t>images</t> in time series during mono- and co-cultures for 10 days. Monoculture did not show the clear angiogenic sprout, whereas co-culture with MSCs accelerated the formation of mature sprouts. MSCs <t>(green)</t> are encapsulated in the collagen gel toward microvessels (red) and attach to the vessel walls’ surface at an early stage. The elongation of sprouts was promoted after day 4. B Spatial correlation analysis between HUVECs and MSCs. The distribution of HUVECs and MSCs from one co-culture sample is shown as density maps and scatter plots by analyzing the co-culture images shown in ( A ). Pearson’s correlation coefficients, r , were calculated for each day and are shown in the plots. The correlation was constantly high (> 0.7) after day 4. C – E Orientation analysis of MSCs around the microvessels. Scale bars: 100 μm. C Definitions of MSC location and orientation around microvessels to analyze their behavior around microvessels. MSCs beside the vessel walls within a marginal region were considered “neighbor” cells, while MSCs outside of the margin were considered “distant” cells. D Image processing in 2D to quantify the location and orientation of MSCs during co-culture using one sample. After the red <t>channel</t> images were processed, the microvessel’s surface edges were extracted and smoothed (red or thick white lines). After the green channel images were processed, the location and orientation of MSCs were quantified. Please note that the areas in the two pictures are from the same ROI on day 1 and day 10. See “ ” section. Scale bars: 100 μm. E Orientation analysis of “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs by fitting ellipses to the binarized MSC objects. Histograms with thick black lines or filled with green represent “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs, respectively. The numbers in the directional charts represent the number of objects that were detected by the particle analysis. The tilt angles of “neighbor” MSCs were constantly smaller than those of “distant” MSCs through co-culture. Statistical significances between “distant” and “neighbor” MSCs were evaluated using a set of time-lapse images from one HUVEC-CapSC co-culture sample with two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni’s post hoc tests using this fluorescent image set ( n = 1). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01
    Green Fluorescence Channel Floid Imaging Station, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/pm35844403-107-26-29?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    green fluorescence channel floid imaging station - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Optik GmbH red–green–blue multi-channel quantum representation of digital images
    Dynamic-sprouting angiogenesis synchronized with MSC migration and adhesion. A Representative 2D fluorescent microscopic <t>images</t> in time series during mono- and co-cultures for 10 days. Monoculture did not show the clear angiogenic sprout, whereas co-culture with MSCs accelerated the formation of mature sprouts. MSCs <t>(green)</t> are encapsulated in the collagen gel toward microvessels (red) and attach to the vessel walls’ surface at an early stage. The elongation of sprouts was promoted after day 4. B Spatial correlation analysis between HUVECs and MSCs. The distribution of HUVECs and MSCs from one co-culture sample is shown as density maps and scatter plots by analyzing the co-culture images shown in ( A ). Pearson’s correlation coefficients, r , were calculated for each day and are shown in the plots. The correlation was constantly high (> 0.7) after day 4. C – E Orientation analysis of MSCs around the microvessels. Scale bars: 100 μm. C Definitions of MSC location and orientation around microvessels to analyze their behavior around microvessels. MSCs beside the vessel walls within a marginal region were considered “neighbor” cells, while MSCs outside of the margin were considered “distant” cells. D Image processing in 2D to quantify the location and orientation of MSCs during co-culture using one sample. After the red <t>channel</t> images were processed, the microvessel’s surface edges were extracted and smoothed (red or thick white lines). After the green channel images were processed, the location and orientation of MSCs were quantified. Please note that the areas in the two pictures are from the same ROI on day 1 and day 10. See “ ” section. Scale bars: 100 μm. E Orientation analysis of “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs by fitting ellipses to the binarized MSC objects. Histograms with thick black lines or filled with green represent “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs, respectively. The numbers in the directional charts represent the number of objects that were detected by the particle analysis. The tilt angles of “neighbor” MSCs were constantly smaller than those of “distant” MSCs through co-culture. Statistical significances between “distant” and “neighbor” MSCs were evaluated using a set of time-lapse images from one HUVEC-CapSC co-culture sample with two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni’s post hoc tests using this fluorescent image set ( n = 1). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01
    Red–Green–Blue Multi Channel Quantum Representation Of Digital Images, supplied by Optik GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/green+channel+imaging/10__1007_slash_s11467___017___0717___3-469-12-19?v=Optik+GmbH
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    red–green–blue multi-channel quantum representation of digital images - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Dynamic-sprouting angiogenesis synchronized with MSC migration and adhesion. A Representative 2D fluorescent microscopic images in time series during mono- and co-cultures for 10 days. Monoculture did not show the clear angiogenic sprout, whereas co-culture with MSCs accelerated the formation of mature sprouts. MSCs (green) are encapsulated in the collagen gel toward microvessels (red) and attach to the vessel walls’ surface at an early stage. The elongation of sprouts was promoted after day 4. B Spatial correlation analysis between HUVECs and MSCs. The distribution of HUVECs and MSCs from one co-culture sample is shown as density maps and scatter plots by analyzing the co-culture images shown in ( A ). Pearson’s correlation coefficients, r , were calculated for each day and are shown in the plots. The correlation was constantly high (> 0.7) after day 4. C – E Orientation analysis of MSCs around the microvessels. Scale bars: 100 μm. C Definitions of MSC location and orientation around microvessels to analyze their behavior around microvessels. MSCs beside the vessel walls within a marginal region were considered “neighbor” cells, while MSCs outside of the margin were considered “distant” cells. D Image processing in 2D to quantify the location and orientation of MSCs during co-culture using one sample. After the red channel images were processed, the microvessel’s surface edges were extracted and smoothed (red or thick white lines). After the green channel images were processed, the location and orientation of MSCs were quantified. Please note that the areas in the two pictures are from the same ROI on day 1 and day 10. See “ ” section. Scale bars: 100 μm. E Orientation analysis of “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs by fitting ellipses to the binarized MSC objects. Histograms with thick black lines or filled with green represent “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs, respectively. The numbers in the directional charts represent the number of objects that were detected by the particle analysis. The tilt angles of “neighbor” MSCs were constantly smaller than those of “distant” MSCs through co-culture. Statistical significances between “distant” and “neighbor” MSCs were evaluated using a set of time-lapse images from one HUVEC-CapSC co-culture sample with two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni’s post hoc tests using this fluorescent image set ( n = 1). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01

    Journal: Stem Cell Research & Therapy

    Article Title: Image-based crosstalk analysis of cell–cell interactions during sprouting angiogenesis using blood-vessel-on-a-chip

    doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03223-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dynamic-sprouting angiogenesis synchronized with MSC migration and adhesion. A Representative 2D fluorescent microscopic images in time series during mono- and co-cultures for 10 days. Monoculture did not show the clear angiogenic sprout, whereas co-culture with MSCs accelerated the formation of mature sprouts. MSCs (green) are encapsulated in the collagen gel toward microvessels (red) and attach to the vessel walls’ surface at an early stage. The elongation of sprouts was promoted after day 4. B Spatial correlation analysis between HUVECs and MSCs. The distribution of HUVECs and MSCs from one co-culture sample is shown as density maps and scatter plots by analyzing the co-culture images shown in ( A ). Pearson’s correlation coefficients, r , were calculated for each day and are shown in the plots. The correlation was constantly high (> 0.7) after day 4. C – E Orientation analysis of MSCs around the microvessels. Scale bars: 100 μm. C Definitions of MSC location and orientation around microvessels to analyze their behavior around microvessels. MSCs beside the vessel walls within a marginal region were considered “neighbor” cells, while MSCs outside of the margin were considered “distant” cells. D Image processing in 2D to quantify the location and orientation of MSCs during co-culture using one sample. After the red channel images were processed, the microvessel’s surface edges were extracted and smoothed (red or thick white lines). After the green channel images were processed, the location and orientation of MSCs were quantified. Please note that the areas in the two pictures are from the same ROI on day 1 and day 10. See “ ” section. Scale bars: 100 μm. E Orientation analysis of “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs by fitting ellipses to the binarized MSC objects. Histograms with thick black lines or filled with green represent “neighbor” or “distant” MSCs, respectively. The numbers in the directional charts represent the number of objects that were detected by the particle analysis. The tilt angles of “neighbor” MSCs were constantly smaller than those of “distant” MSCs through co-culture. Statistical significances between “distant” and “neighbor” MSCs were evaluated using a set of time-lapse images from one HUVEC-CapSC co-culture sample with two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni’s post hoc tests using this fluorescent image set ( n = 1). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01

    Article Snippet: Green channel stack images were binarized using IMARIS to determine the binding sites of MSCs on the microvessel surfaces.

    Techniques: Migration, Co-Culture Assay, Particle Size Analysis